Strategic workshop
A two-day workshop that is a decision-making process rather than a training course. The organisation leaves it with an operational five-year vision, a handful of clear strategic choices, a list of priority actions with named owners, and a map of how decisions transfer to successors and to the team.
What problem we solve
The direction sits in the heads of a few people, and in each of them it looks slightly different. Strategic decisions get made alongside operational ones, the list of priorities grows instead of shrinking, and accountability for the decisions that matter has never been formally handed over — even where everyone has long known who is meant to take it. So the conversation about strategy ends in a presentation after which nobody changes how they work, because no choice was made: nothing was agreed that the organisation will stop doing.
Who it is for
How we work
01 Phase 0. Preparation and upfront diagnosis
- A survey or conversation with selected managers and team members
- In-depth interviews with decision-makers and with the people expected to take over accountability
- A SWOT analysis with the people who deliver the work — the perspective of those who will have to execute the strategy
- Additional workshop participants identified from the picture of the organisation rather than from a list fixed in advance
- Output: an objective picture of the organisation and the input material for the strategic work
02 Day 1. Diagnosis and direction
- Opening and the workshop contract: objectives, ways of working, the role of each participant, and the key tensions named out loud — growth, accountability and succession
- A SWOT analysis with the decision-makers and a conversation about the culture of the organisation
- The business „as it is today”: clients and market expectations, competitors, processes, technology and tooling, people and competencies
- Two control questions: which strategy is winning for us today, and what price are we paying for it — set against the findings of the upfront diagnosis
- The key strategic challenges over a five-year horizon: standardisation against flexibility, automation against people's know-how, centralisation against autonomy, the owner's role against the team's accountability
- An operational vision of the future, framed as „a day in the life of the organisation” five years out: how the processes run, how decisions are made, what the director and the successor actually do, and where technology genuinely supports the work
03 Day 2. Choices, priorities and succession
- Strategic choices made with a selectivity tool: what we eliminate, what we reduce, what we strengthen and what we have to create — in processes, competencies and systems
- The output of this part: between three and five key strategic choices
- The key strategic actions, under one rule — one action, one accountable person — and with the focus on impact rather than on the number of projects
- KPIs and success factors: delivery of the strategy, stability of the processes, quality of decisions, and progress in handing over accountability
- Succession understood as a transfer of accountability: a map of the decisions the owner makes today, those that move to the director and the team, and the competencies and support the successor needs
- Closing and commitment: individual commitments from participants, the needs raised by the team, and a plan for the first ninety days
04 After the workshop. Strategic summary
- The choices, actions, KPIs and the map of transferred accountability brought together into one document
- The conclusions discussed with the people accountable for delivery
- A clear statement of what still has to be settled outside the workshop, and in what order
What the organisation receives
- A shared, operational vision for the organisation over a five-year horizon
- Between three and five clear strategic choices
- A list of priority actions with named accountability — one action, one person
- A set of KPIs measuring delivery of the strategy and progress on succession
- A map of how decisions and accountability transfer from the owner to the director and the team
- Individual commitments from participants and a plan for the first ninety days
- A strategic summary prepared after the workshop
Format and timing
Phase 0, before the workshop: a survey or conversation with selected people, in-depth interviews and a SWOT analysis — around one working day in total, on site or remotely. The workshop: two days on site, five to six hours each. After the workshop: a strategic summary
Experts
A certified business trainer, strategist and coach; works with organisations on growth strategy, succession and the handover of decisions and accountability. Owns the design of the whole process and keeps the findings of the diagnosis consistent with the choices made in the room
Prepares and analyses the survey, runs in-depth interviews with decision-makers and successors, and facilitates the SWOT analysis with the people who deliver the work; assembles a picture of the organisation seen from several levels
Runs the two days of group work; responsible for making sure the conversation ends in a decision rather than a list of topics — and that every agreed action has one owner
A workshop that ends in a decision
The aim of this process is to work out the key strategic choices and to prepare the organisation to operate with succession in view. The workshop is a decision-making process, not a training course — what it is for is putting the direction of growth in order, making conscious strategic decisions and setting the priorities for action.
That distinction is not wordplay. A training course on strategy ends with knowledge of a method. A strategic workshop ends with a list of things the organisation will stop doing — the hardest part of any strategy, and the only part that actually frees up resources.
Phase 0: before anyone walks into the room
The first day of a workshop can easily be burned on establishing what the organisation actually looks like. So that work happens earlier: a survey or conversation with selected managers and team members, in-depth interviews with decision-makers and with the people expected to take over accountability, and a SWOT analysis with the people who deliver the work.
That last element matters most and is skipped most often. A SWOT run only at board level describes the organisation as the board sees it. The same SWOT run with the people who will execute the strategy usually names different weaknesses — and it is precisely that gap which becomes the input material for the strategic work.
Day one: the picture and the dilemmas
We start with the contract: why we are here, how we work, what each person’s role is, and which tensions we are naming out loud — growth, accountability, succession. Then we build the picture of the business „as it is today”: clients and market expectations, competitors, processes, technology and tooling, people and competencies. Two questions close that part: which strategy is winning for us today, and what price are we paying for it.
Next we name the key challenges over a five-year horizon, and we do it as dilemmas rather than aspirations: standardisation or flexibility, automation or people’s know-how, centralisation or autonomy, the owner’s role or the team’s accountability. A dilemma forces a choice. An aspiration lets everyone agree with everything at once.
The day closes with the operational vision: „a day in the life of the organisation” five years out — how the processes run, how decisions are made, what the director and the successor actually do, and where technology genuinely supports the work rather than merely surrounding it.
Day two: choices, accountability, succession
We work with a strategic selectivity tool that asks four questions: what do we eliminate, what do we reduce, what do we strengthen and what do we have to create — in processes, in competencies and in systems. The output is between three and five key choices. No more than that, because a strategy with a dozen priorities is a wish list.
From the choices we derive the actions, under a single rule: one action means one accountable person, and the focus is on impact rather than on the number of projects. To those actions we attach KPIs showing delivery of the strategy, stability of the processes, quality of decisions and progress in handing over accountability.
The final block is succession understood as a transfer of accountability. A map is produced: which decisions the owner makes today, which of them move to the director and the team, and what competencies and support the person taking them over will need. The workshop closes with individual commitments from participants and a plan for the first ninety days.
What remains after the workshop
An operational five-year vision, between three and five strategic choices, a list of priority actions with named accountability, a set of KPIs and a map of transferred decisions. After the workshop we prepare a strategic summary that brings these together into one document and points out what still has to be settled outside the room.
A boundary worth knowing
A strategic workshop is a consulting service, not a training course. It has no certification syllabus, no level and no open enrolment date — it has an upfront diagnosis, two days of decision-making work, and a summary. If what you need is to build strategic competencies in a training format, the courses linked from this page are the right path.
Let’s talk about which decisions keep getting postponed in your organisation — the shape of Phase 0 follows from that.
Frequently asked questions
How does a strategic workshop differ from a training course on strategy?
In what is being worked on. A training course teaches the method — a strategic workshop is a decision-making process: we work on your organisation and we finish with decisions that hold afterwards. If two days end without choices, without priorities and without anyone knowing who owns what, the workshop failed, however interesting the discussion was.
Why run Phase 0 if we are meeting for two days anyway?
Because otherwise the first day is spent building a picture of the organisation instead of working on its direction. The survey, the in-depth interviews and the SWOT analysis with the people who deliver the work give a view from several levels, not just from the top floor. The workshop then starts by confronting that material rather than from nothing.
How many people should take part?
We do not set that up front. The composition is a design decision: the room needs people who can make a choice and own an action, alongside people who bring the financial, HR and operational perspective. Exactly who to invite is settled while the workshop is being prepared, once the upfront diagnosis is in.
Is the workshop worth running if we are not planning a succession?
Yes, although the weight of the second day shifts. Succession is a particular case of a broader question about transferring decisions: which calls are still made in one place even though the organisation outgrew that arrangement long ago. A map of transferred accountability is useful where nobody is leaving too — because it shows the decision bottleneck.
What happens after the workshop?
A strategic summary is produced: the choices, the actions with named owners, the KPIs and the map of transferred decisions in one document, discussed with the people accountable for delivery. The plan for the first ninety days is written by the participants themselves while still in the room — so that each commitment has an owner rather than a recipient.
Can the workshop be run remotely?
The two days of work on the choices are run on site — resolving tensions inside a leadership team travels badly over a remote format. Part of the Phase 0 conversations can happen online, and usually does when the decision-makers work from different locations.
Request a quote
Trusted by us
We work with teams at the largest Polish companies
Interested in this service?
Get in touch — we agree the scope and the schedule around your organisation's needs.