Imagine two technology companies of comparable size, operating in the same market, offering similar products and having almost identical budgets. Both are implementing the same expansion strategy into a new customer segment. After twelve months, the first one experiences dynamic growth — teams collaborate across silos, decisions are made quickly, and employees proactively propose process improvements. The second company is drowning in internal conflicts, turnover reaches thirty percent, and the strategy, though identical on paper, doesn’t translate into results. What makes them different? Not strategy, not technology, and not budget. What makes them different is organizational culture — that invisible yet omnipresent system of beliefs, norms, and behaviors that determines how people actually work when no one is watching.
Organizational culture is a topic that in recent years has advanced from academic textbooks to boardrooms. Business leaders recognize that no transformation — digital, agile, or strategic — will succeed without consciously shaping the environment in which people work. This article provides theoretical frameworks and practical tools for understanding, diagnosing, and building a culture that supports organizational goals.
Quick Navigation
What you’ll learn from this article:
- What organizational culture is and what layers it consists of according to Edgar Schein’s model
- How Cameron and Quinn classify four types of cultures within the Competing Values Framework
- How to diagnose the current organizational culture and identify gaps
- Why culture “eats strategy for breakfast” and how to achieve their alignment
- How leaders can consciously shape culture, including in remote and hybrid environments
What Is Organizational Culture — The Three Levels of Schein’s Model
Edgar Schein, professor at MIT Sloan School of Management, proposed one of the most influential models of organizational culture. According to Schein, culture functions at three interconnected levels, which can be compared to an iceberg — the deeper the level, the harder it is to observe, but the more strongly it influences people’s behavior in the organization.
Level one — artifacts. These are everything you can see, hear, and feel when entering an organization: office layout, dress code, internal communication language, meeting style, logo, or onboarding process. Artifacts are easy to observe but difficult to interpret correctly without understanding the deeper layers. A company may have a modern office with a ping-pong table while simultaneously having a toxic culture of micromanagement.
Level two — espoused values and norms. These are the organization’s official beliefs about what is good, proper, and desirable. We find them in the company’s mission, code of ethics, or job postings: “we prioritize innovation,” “people are our most valuable resource,” “we operate transparently.” The problem is that espoused values don’t always align with what the organization actually does. A company may proclaim openness to mistakes while simultaneously punishing people who admit to errors.
Level three — basic assumptions. This is the deepest and most important layer of culture — unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs about the nature of reality and people. For example: “people naturally avoid work, so they must be controlled” or “conflict is destructive and should be avoided at all costs.” Basic assumptions are so deeply rooted that organization members are often unaware of them. However, they are the strongest driver of behaviors and the hardest layer of culture to change.
Understanding these three levels has fundamental practical significance. When an organization wants to change culture but focuses solely on artifacts — new office arrangement, logo change, announcing new values on the wall — the change is superficial and unsustainable. True cultural transformation requires reaching the level of basic assumptions and consciously working through them.
Four Types of Cultures According to Cameron and Quinn — Competing Values Framework
While Schein’s model explains how culture is built, Kim Cameron and Robert Quinn’s Competing Values Framework (CVF) answers the question of what culture dominates in a given organization. CVF is based on two axes: flexibility vs. stability and internal vs. external orientation. Four types of cultures emerge from their intersection.
| Culture Type | Orientation | Key Characteristics | Example Organization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clan (Collaborate) | Internal + flexibility | Family atmosphere, mentoring, employee engagement, teamwork | Small startups, family businesses, non-profit organizations |
| Adhocracy (Create) | External + flexibility | Innovation, experimentation, risk-taking, entrepreneurship | Tech companies, creative agencies, R&D laboratories |
| Market (Compete) | External + stability | Results-oriented, competitiveness, goal achievement, market aggressiveness | Sales corporations, consulting firms, investment banks |
| Hierarchy (Control) | Internal + stability | Processes, procedures, predictability, operational efficiency, control | Public administration, military, pharmaceutical industry |
Clan culture resembles a large family. Leaders play the role of mentors, and the organization holds together through loyalty and tradition. Strengths are engagement and collaboration, but risks include avoiding difficult decisions and resistance to change.
Adhocracy culture is an environment where innovation and willingness to experiment are rewarded. Adhocratic organizations respond quickly to market changes but may suffer from lack of structure and employee burnout.
Market culture focuses on achieving measurable results and winning against competition. Organizations with this culture are efficient and goal-oriented but may generate excessive pressure, weaken psychological safety, and lead to short-term thinking at the expense of long-term development.
Hierarchy culture values stability, processes, and control. It works well where predictability and regulatory compliance are crucial but can inhibit innovation.
No organization is a pure type — every company represents a unique mix of these four cultures, with one or two dominating. The desired cultural profile depends on industry, company development phase, and strategy.
How to Diagnose Organizational Culture
Consciously shaping culture first requires a reliable diagnosis of the current state. You cannot change something you don’t understand. Fortunately, there are proven tools and methods that allow you to “measure” something as elusive as culture.
OCAI — Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument. A questionnaire developed by Cameron and Quinn, based on the Competing Values Framework. Respondents distribute 100 points among four descriptions corresponding to the four culture types — once describing the current state and once the desired state. Results allow creating a visual culture profile and identifying the gap between current and target state.
Cultural audit. In-depth diagnosis including individual and group interviews, observation of organizational rituals, analysis of internal documents, examination of HR metrics (turnover, absence, engagement), and analysis of stories circulating in the company. Audit goes deeper than questionnaires and allows reaching the level of basic assumptions.
Observation of “moments of truth”. Culture manifests most clearly in crisis situations. How does the organization respond to a customer complaint? What happens when someone makes a costly mistake? Who gets promoted and for what? Answers to these questions reveal more about culture than any strategic document.
Analysis of informal structures. Who really has influence in the organization, regardless of formal hierarchy? What unwritten rules apply? Which behaviors are actually rewarded? These questions help uncover hidden cultural mechanisms. Diagnosis should not be a one-time event — culture evolves, and regular research allows early detection of undesirable trends.
Culture Eats Strategy for Breakfast — Why Alignment Is Key
The sentence attributed to Peter Drucker — “culture eats strategy for breakfast” — has become one of the most frequently quoted in management literature. Regardless of authorship, its message is confirmed by decades of research and business practice.
Strategy is an action plan — it says what the organization intends to do. Culture is how the organization actually operates day-to-day. When strategy and culture are aligned, the organization achieves extraordinary results. When they’re in conflict, culture almost always wins.
Consider an example. A company implements an innovation strategy, but its culture is deeply rooted hierarchy: decisions are made solely at the top, procedures are rigid, and failure is punished. Employees won’t experiment, even if management officially encourages it. Strategy says “be innovative,” but culture says “don’t take risks” — and culture wins because it’s a deeper, stronger force.
The situation looks similar during agile transformation in an organization. Many companies implement agile methodologies at the process and tool level, but their culture remains hierarchical and controlling. The result is “agile theater” — Scrum ceremonies are performed, Kanban boards hang on walls, but mindset and work methods don’t change.
Achieving alignment between culture and strategy requires several steps: diagnose the current culture, define the desired cultural profile resulting from strategy, identify key gaps, develop a transformation plan focusing on specific behaviors and mechanisms, and above all — be patient, because changing culture is a process lasting years, not months.
Building the Desired Culture — Rituals, Stories, Symbols, and Recruitment
Organizational culture is not something that can be decreed by CEO’s order. It’s shaped through daily actions, decisions, and interactions. However, there are several mechanisms that leaders can consciously use to build and strengthen the desired culture.
Rituals and ceremonies. Regular, repeatable practices that express and strengthen organizational values. This could be a weekly team meeting where people share failures and lessons learned (a ritual supporting learning culture). Or monthly recognition of the employee who best embodied company values (a ritual strengthening desired behaviors). Rituals create a sense of belonging and continuity.
Stories and narratives. Stories circulating in the company have enormous power to shape culture. If the company legend is a story about how the founder didn’t sleep for three nights to meet a client deadline, the cultural message is clear: sacrifice for the client is the highest value. Leaders should consciously care about what stories are told — for example, publicly sharing about a team that dared to experiment and succeeded.
Symbols and artifacts. Office space layout, communication tools, conference room names — all of this carries a cultural message. If the boardroom is the largest room in the company and teamwork rooms are cramped, the message is clear: hierarchy is more important than collaboration.
Recruitment and onboarding. This is one of the most effective mechanisms for shaping culture. Hiring people whose values align with the desired culture is much easier than later trying to “convert” them. The recruitment process should evaluate not only technical competencies but also cultural fit. Meanwhile, onboarding is the moment when a new employee is most open to absorbing norms — it’s worth using it to consciously introduce company culture.
Reward and promotion systems. What the organization rewards and promotes defines its actual culture much more strongly than declarations. If a company says it values collaboration but promotes only individual “stars,” the real message is: only individual results count. Reward systems must be consistent with the desired culture.
The Leader’s Role in Shaping Organizational Culture
The leader is the most important architect of organizational culture. What the leader does, says, and — equally important — what they don’t do and don’t say, shapes culture more strongly than any program or initiative.
Schein wrote that organizational culture is essentially the “shadow of the leader” — a reflection of what the leader truly believes and how they behave. Employees don’t listen to declarations; they observe behaviors. If the CEO talks about transparency but doesn’t share information with the team, a culture of transparency won’t emerge. If a manager proclaims openness to mistakes but publicly reprimands someone who reported a problem, psychological safety will be destroyed in an instant.
Leaders shape culture through several key mechanisms: through what they pay attention to (topics, metrics, behaviors they comment on), through how they respond to crisis situations, through resource allocation decisions, through whom they hire and promote, and through their own example — modeling behaviors they expect from others.
Shaping culture is not just the responsibility of top management. Every manager and team leader creates a microclimate in their team. An organization can have several subcultures coexisting alongside the dominant culture, which is why investing in leadership competencies at all levels is crucial for cultural consistency.
Toxic Culture — Warning Signs and Ways to Respond
Not every organizational culture is healthy. A toxic culture is one that systematically harms employees, undermines trust, and sabotages business results. Research by MIT Sloan Management Review showed that toxic culture is more than ten times stronger predictor of employee departures than compensation.
Signs of toxic culture include: normalization of overtime, micromanagement and lack of trust in employees, culture of fear where people are afraid to speak the truth, blaming instead of seeking solutions, favoritism and lack of meritocracy, lack of consequences — different rules for “stars” and the rest of the team, as well as ignoring mobbing.
Changing toxic culture requires courage and determination. The first step is honest recognition of the problem — often with external audit help, because people inside the organization may be “culturally blind” to dysfunctions. The next step is clearly defining unacceptable behaviors and consistently enforcing standards — including for people in the highest positions. Investment in communication competencies is also necessary, including approaches like NVC, which can be an effective tool for cultural transformation.
The process of healing culture is long and painful, but the consequences of neglecting it — talent loss, innovation decline, reputational risk — are far more serious.
Organizational Culture in Remote and Hybrid Work
Remote and hybrid work, which has become a permanent fixture in many organizations, poses completely new challenges for organizational culture. Traditional mechanisms of cultural transmission — spontaneous kitchen conversations, shared lunches, physical office presence — have been significantly limited or eliminated.
In a distributed environment, culture must be shaped more intentionally than ever before. Spontaneity is replaced by designed interactions. This means, among other things, deliberately creating spaces for informal conversations (virtual “water cooler” meetings), greater emphasis on asynchronous written communication that must clearly reflect company values, conscious building of team rituals that function in remote format, and more intensive investment in onboarding, because a new remote employee doesn’t “absorb” culture by osmosis as in the office.
A particular challenge is maintaining a sense of belonging and community. When people don’t meet physically, it’s easy to feel isolated and experience erosion of team identity. Leaders must consciously build connections — regular one-on-ones, shared celebration of successes, and open sharing of challenges gain even greater importance in the remote model.
At the same time, hybrid work creates a risk of “two-speed culture,” where office workers have privileged access to information and decision-makers, while remote workers are marginalized. Preventing this requires conscious policies ensuring equal opportunities regardless of location. On the other hand, remote work paradoxically can strengthen certain elements of culture — when communication happens in writing, decisions are better documented, which promotes transparency and trust culture.
How EITT Supports Organizations in Building Strong Culture
Building and transforming organizational culture is a process that requires not only theoretical knowledge but above all practical competencies — from cultural diagnosis skills, through facilitation and communication techniques, to the ability to lead teams through change. EITT has been supporting organizations in developing these exact competencies for years.
The network of over 500 EITT experts includes specialists in leadership, change management, communication, and agile methodologies — areas directly impacting organizational culture. With a portfolio of over 2,500 completed trainings, rated by participants at 4.8 out of 5, EITT delivers development programs tailored to organizations’ cultural challenges — from psychological safety building workshops, through leadership competency development, to comprehensive cultural transformation academies.
Summary
Organizational culture is not an abstract concept from management textbooks but a living, breathing system that daily determines an organization’s success or failure. Schein’s model teaches us that culture has three layers — from visible artifacts, through espoused values, to deeply hidden assumptions that truly drive people’s behaviors. Cameron and Quinn’s Competing Values Framework provides a language to describe culture types and tools to measure them.
Key conclusions: diagnosis is the foundation of any transformation; culture and strategy must go hand in hand; culture is shaped by daily behaviors and rituals, not by declarations; the leader is the most important carrier of culture; and changing culture is a marathon, not a sprint — it requires patience, consistency, and resilience to inevitable difficulties.
Organizations that undertake conscious work on culture gain a competitive advantage that’s difficult to copy. Strategy can be observed, technology can be bought, people can be hired — but building a culture where these people give their best requires years of work. That’s why it’s worth starting today.
Read also
- Transforming Organizational Culture Through Nonviolent Communication: The Path to Sustainable Development
- FOMO Syndrome in Teams - How to Build an Organizational Culture Free from Digital Compulsion
- DevOps: implementation, culture, tools and business benefits
Develop your skills
Want to deepen your knowledge in this area? Check out our training led by experienced EITT instructors.
➡️ Company values - building organizational culture — EITT training
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it take to change an organization’s culture?
Meaningful cultural transformation typically takes between two and five years, depending on the organization’s size, the depth of change required, and leadership commitment. Quick fixes at the artifact level may appear fast but rarely produce lasting results without addressing deeper values and basic assumptions.
What is the most common reason cultural transformation initiatives fail?
The most frequent cause of failure is a disconnect between declared values and actual leadership behavior. When leaders proclaim new cultural principles but continue to reward old behaviors or make decisions that contradict the stated direction, employees quickly lose trust in the transformation effort.
Can an organization have more than one type of culture at the same time?
Yes, most organizations represent a blend of multiple culture types from Cameron and Quinn’s Competing Values Framework, with one or two types dominating. Additionally, different departments or teams often develop distinct subcultures that coexist alongside the overarching organizational culture.
How can remote and hybrid organizations maintain a strong culture?
Remote and hybrid organizations must be more intentional about culture-building by designing structured opportunities for informal interaction, investing heavily in onboarding, and ensuring equal access to information regardless of work location. Written asynchronous communication, regular virtual rituals, and conscious leadership presence become essential substitutes for spontaneous office interactions.